The time has come to step back and look at the bigger agenda of what’s behind climate lockdowns.
The groundwork for Mazzucato’s proposals have already been laid and seeded into the public consciousness.
This agenda goes by many names and has many faces but at it’s core it is a deception which promotes sustainable development to combat climate change through organizations like the United Nations.
The deception rests on the successful deployment of the Hegelian Dialectic, also known as problem, reaction, solution.
In this case,
- governments and institutions have deemed climate change to be the most pressing issue facing civilization (create the initial problem)
- the public then demands protection and aid in combating this problem (manage the public reaction)
- lastly come to the rescue with sustainability goals (sell the pre-planned solution) which can be brought in without any resistance
It is through these central pillars that we will conclude this series and present solutions for derailing this dystopian vision of the future.
The Truth about Sustainable Development
Though her work is presented as an opinion piece, Mazzucato is simply promoting a larger agenda.
The agenda is pushed through everything from The Green New Deal and The Paris Agreement to The Great Reset crafted by the World Economic Forum and the United Nation’s 2030 Agenda (formerly Agenda 21).
These are the instruments which serve as tools for the elite to spread their globalist philosophies.
Those familiar with these organizations and accompanying legislation are rightly skeptical of presidents and prime ministers mixing with hedge fund managers, CEOs, European royalty, unelected technocrats, and career bureaucrats to dictate the future of the world.
Supposedly this is done in the interest of saving the planet but a closer look at what’s behind these agendas tells a very different story.
At the core of these visions of the future is sustainable development…
The United Nations and it’s acolytes in the mainstream media promise a world where economic growth still flourishes without harming the environment, so long as the world adopts their 17 goals for sustainable development – page 12.
These goals include,
No Poverty, Zero Hunger, Affordable and Clean Energy, and Quality Education…
When presented in this simple way it is difficult to find issue with those goals.
After all, who doesn’t want a world where poverty has been eradicated and children aren’t going hungry?
While photos of smiling African children or wind turbines against a pastoral background usually accompany reporting on the goals there is little context given to the history or players involved in their creation. How these goals will actually be achieved is a question mostly left unanswered as well.
Once these issues are addressed one really wonders if this agenda is what they say it is, or if there’s more to the story.
So where did the term sustainable development come from and how did it become the core of the United Nation’s goals for the future of mankind?
In 1983, Agenda 21 began taking shape in the UN as part of the Brundtland Commission who’s goal was to unite the world on a path towards sustainable development.
What came out of this commission was a work called Our Common Future which popularized the term sustainable development and defined it as,
“development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
Short, sweet, and without substance…
The commission conveniently featured a cadre of people close to the Rockefeller Family, who’s fingerprints on the environmental movement can be found everywhere…
It was headed by,
- Gro Harlem Brundtland, a member of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission who would go on to become the Prime Minister of Norway
- Oil man and Rockefeller associate Maurice Strong
- Italian politician Susanna Agnelli who’s brother Gianni considered David Rockefeller to be in his inner circle
- Former EPA head William Ruckelshaus who ran in the same circles in Washington D.C. as Nelson and David Rockefeller
- Canadian environmentalist Jim MacNeil who co-authored Beyond Interdependence, a work on sustainable development for the Trilateral Commission
The United Nations’ Plans for The Future
The agenda was updated and made public in the form of a 300-page document in 1992 at the UN’s Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and was adopted by 178 governments.
The agenda was expanded upon in the 1995 report, Global Biodiversity Assessment (GBA) which elaborates on,
how society needs to be transformed in the name of sustainability…
These works leave no stone unturned when it comes to reshaping the world but there are three factors that are of particular use for creating a control grid:
- the abolishment of private property
- population control
- total resource management
Perhaps the most far-reaching transformation is with regards to private property which will largely be prohibited.
They explain that,
“Property rights can still be allocated to environmental public goods, but in this case they should be restricted to usufructual or user rights.
Harvesting quotas, emission permits and development rights… are all examples of such rights.”
This in essences,
turns over all land, resources, and property to be managed and distributed by bureaucrats who will usher the rural and suburban populations into designated urban spaces.
One interpretation of Agenda 21 includes population control as part of the equation.
To maintain current standards of living in North America the authors of the GBA estimated that the world population would need to be one billion, two to three billion if “frugal European standards” were desirable.
The implicit choice there is that either those standards of living must become a thing of the past or that much of the world’s population will need to be done away with.
The authors do not mention how we would return to those levels but with eugenicists like the Rockefellers in support of this agenda it is frightening to imagine the possibilities.
The ability to inventory the world’s production and consumption of any and all resources was a desired but far-off dream of the technocrats of the early 20th century.
This dream was closer to being possible in the mid-90s when the GBA stated their goal to:
Expand or promote databases on production and consumption and develop methodologies for analyzing them…
Assess the relationship between production and consumption, environment, technological adaption and innovation, economic growth and development, and demographic factors…
Identify balanced patterns of consumption worldwide…
The language used here makes this sound like a boring exercise in record keeping but this banal language, when put in the context of a plot like Agenda 21, becomes much more nefarious.
Researcher Rosa Koire has been studying the UN’s environmental agendas for decades and calls this cataloging,
“The action plan, the blueprint to inventory and control all land, all water, all plants, all minerals, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all information, all energy, all education, and all human beings.”
In today’s technologically-driven world, and with the growing Internet of Things, this is a very real possibility.
It became clear in 2015 that 2021 was un unrealistic goal and the agenda once again received a facelift and became Agenda 2030.
The agenda outlined in Agenda 21 was reframed as the UN’s Sustainable Goals, 17 interlocking items meant to serve as the blueprint for a sustainable future.
They can be read about in great detail and are very appealing on the surface.
The catch is that the technocrats in charge of pushing this agenda have to be trusted and as has been outlined previously, and well-documented in other places, this is a huge ask.
A Look at The Green Economy
These technocrats are also asking to be in charge of world finances.
Both the World Bank and International Monetary Foundation were spawned from the United Nations and represent, among other institutions and central banks, the financial arm of the elite.
Those in support of this agenda perpetually claim that capitalism has failed us and that along with this reorientation towards sustainability the foundations of our economy will need to change.
Patrick Wood, in his seminal book, Technocracy Rising outlines how this will work in the green economy of the future:
It is plainly evident today that the world is laboring under a dysfunctional system of price-based economics as evidenced by the rapid decline of value in paper currencies.
The era of fiat (irredeemable paper currency) was introduced in 1971 when President Richard Nixon decoupled the U.S. dollar from gold.
Because the dollar-turned-fiat was the world’s primary reserve asset, all other currencies eventually followed suit, leaving us today with a global sea of paper that is increasingly undesired, unstable and unusable.
The deathly economic state of today’s world is a direct reflection of the sum of its sick and dying currencies, but this could soon change.
Forces are already at work to position a new Carbon Currency as the ultimate solution to global calls for poverty reduction, population control, environmental control, global warming, energy allocation and blanket distribution of economic wealth.
Unfortunately for individual people living in this new system, it will also require authoritarian and centralized control over all aspects of life, from cradle to grave.
What is Carbon Currency and how does it work?
In a nutshell,
Carbon Currency will be based on the regular allocation of available energy to the people of the world.
If not used within a period of time, the Currency will expire so that the same people can receive a new allocation based on new energy production quotas for the next period.
Because the energy supply chain is already dominated by the global elite, setting energy production quotas will limit the amount of Carbon Currency in circulation at any one time.
It will also naturally limit manufacturing, food production and people movement.
The elite know this is coming and have already positioned themselves accordingly.
- Al Gore has already profited nicely off his green investments
- members of the Rothschild family are backing sustainability
- the Rockefellers have divested from fossil fuels without hurting their net worth
- companies like Tesla have made people rich in the name of being eco-friendly
As a matter of fact, a bank (discussion begins at 39:41) has already been set up to facilitate this transition into a new economic paradigm.
It’s another case of new boss, same as the old boss…
With most private property rights gone, bodily autonomy in the hands of the ruling class, and complete centralization of the economy there is really nothing outside of the grasp of the elite in this system.
How to Derail Sustainable Development
The cynicism held by those behind this agenda is astounding.
They believe that humanity is so distrustful and irresponsible that every facet of their existence must be restricted and controlled. This doesn’t even touch on the eugenicist beliefs held by many within their ranks who would rather see most people simply done away with so they can live in a world unspoiled by their inferiors.
While the fight against such an overarching plan may seem impossible there is a part each person can play in resisting this nightmarish takeover of the world.
If the problem is framed as a battle of David v. Goliath, in which the dismantling the UN or wresting away the fortunes of the Gates and Rockefellers of the world are the goals, then the task seems insurmountable.
The much simpler resolution to this problem, and one which allows everyone to do their part, is to just opt out and build anew…
It is pure myth to assume that these bureaucracies need to exist or that the billionaires need to have the power that they claim to hold.
It is simply a choice to walk away and disavow the system.
There are problems in society that need addressing and there are certainly environmental issues that need fixing but these can be handled in a decentralized fashion.
To think that a technocratic elite knows what’s best for each man, woman, and child on the planet better than they themselves is ridiculous…
we need a free market of ideas, innovations, and technologies where individuals and communities can voluntarily collaborate to create the solutions.
A world where mankind works hand-in-hand, not as mortal enemies, could lead to levels of advancement and abundance of society unthinkable by these psychopathic elite.
Once this is understood on a wide scale the work can begin on a large scale.
However, nobody has to wait that long as there are already individual tasks that can be done.
- Look for signs of these agendas being deployed in your community and push back. Local Agenda 21 serves as the vehicle for taking the larger agenda of the United Nations and reformulating their goals to make them adoptable at the local level.
- If these goals are rolled out it will be much harder to connect with like-minded people in the smart cities of the future. Form Freedom Cells and other voluntary groups to organize, share skills, build community, etc.
- The mainstream media collaborates with the United Nations and governments around the world and therefore cannot be trusted to tell the truth on these issues. Find alternative sources of information on these matters.
- The Internet of Things will be used to spy on the public and under sustainable development goals they will be used to ration resources. Do not allow these devices in your home. Instead, go off the grid or turn to decentralized technology.
- Central planning of the food supply in the Soviet Union and in Communist China led to widespread famine and starvation and yet this is the model the UN hopes to replicate. Grow your own food and support your local farmers. Decentralizing the food supply is critical to preventing food shortages while helping to build community.
- Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and all the other tech giants all collaborate with the United Nations to push this agenda. Opt-out of these controlled platforms and move towards open-source alternatives.
- When the Dollar, Euro, Yuan, etc. collapse the central banks will have controlled digital currencies at the ready. To insulate yourself from the fallout it is worth considering diversifying away from fiat currency. Precious metals, cryptocurrency, local currencies, cash, barter systems, and real assets are all alternatives.
- Take steps to become more self-sufficient. The less you have to rely on technocratic institutions, the state, controlled technological platforms, banks, pharmaceutical companies, etc the less they can interfere with your life.
- Digital censorship is a serious threat to freedom so please share this information. Spread links to websites like this, host documentary screenings, start a book club, distribute USBs loaded with information, bring up Agenda 2030 in conversation, etc. There really is no wrong way to do this last one!
This list is hardly exhausted and will mean different things to different people but that’s really the point. Nobody is better suited to direct your life than you.
As we all learn, share, and grow this destructive agenda can be dismantled while a beautiful new chapter of humanity begins.
by Matt Nilsson